When was the last time you saw a military peer get fired from a position? Doesn’t happen too often, right? In the civilian world, the last several years has been characterized by high unemployment and a difficult job market even for new college graduates. In contrast, the military is intentionally difficult to enter, but also hard to be removed from. Why is that?
Several reasons are important:
- The military invests a lot of time/resources in developing specialized skills
- The nature of service is honorable and we give the service member much credit for volunteering to serve
- Service members are not easily replaceable
- The military asks a lot of its service members, so it gives a lot of leeway for marginal behavior
- Service members typically move every 2-5 years, so supervisors can “wait out” bad performance and pass it down the line
As a leader, you have mediocre performers on your team, the ones who fulfill their duty and not much more. They keep the organization running by learning just enough to progress in the military’s “up or out” system. They’re not destructive, they’re just there.
But how do you identify the bad apples, the ones who will have a corrosive, or even dangerous effect on your unit or another unit down the road? What subordinate traits are unacceptable and worth of dismissal?